Teachers are better than computers debate

Share via Email Teachers are role models creating trust and inspiring students in an environment where learning occurs — technology alone cannot offer these skills, says Pamela Wright. At a recent British Council debate, Is teaching obsolete?

Teachers are better than computers debate

Thomas Arnett Aug 26, There are some innovation and technology enthusiasts who claim that computer-based learning will soon replace teachers. Just take a look at some recent op-eds by Andy Kessler and Richard Galant. They point to the accessibility of information via the Internet and the recent advances in online instruction and adaptive learning as harbingers of teacher obsolescence.

These assertions are alarming to those who advocate the importance of teachers, like Diane Ravitch and Wendy Kopp. They point to a strong body of research that affirms the importance of good teachers. So how do we make sense of Teachers are better than computers debate war of words and tumult of opinions?

Are teachers better than computers | kaja-net.com

To one degree or another, both sides are overlooking important considerations. Those who proclaim that computers will replace teachers often naively reduce teaching to mere instruction and assessment.

In doing so, they forget the true breadth and complexity of the job teachers perform. Computers are becoming better at providing customized direct instruction and at assessing student mastery of foundational knowledge and skills.

Why new technologies could never replace great teaching At a recent British Council debate, Teachers do not simply impart information and knowledge; teaching is not merely about systems. Computers VS Teachers. by Tuna on December 13, - am. Also, Computers are becoming better at providing well-structured teaching materials and assessing student from their knowledge and skills. If students enter the results of exams or their weak points, computers can make decisions of students’ levels based on the . Teachers are better than computers because teachers actually have emotions and the computers and robots don't actually have kaja-net.com a kid says that his stomach hurts then the robot would probably say that they do not understand or say to deal with it and yet teachers actually wouldn't do that.

But good teachers do much more than present information and drill the fundamentals. High-quality teachers guide their students through activities and projects that stretch them to analyze, synthesize, and apply what they have learned across academic subjects and into the real world.

They provide personalized, qualitative feedback to help students develop their critical and creative thinking. They create a classroom culture that intrinsically motivates students by honoring their hard work and by making academic achievement socially relevant.

Those human aspects of good instruction are not going to be replaced by machines anytime soon. On the other side of the debate, those who emphasize the importance of traditional teachers often do not notice how unrealistic it is to provide high-quality teachers at scale in the current monolithic model of classroom-based instruction.

They overlook the fact that the breadth and complexity of the job of good teaching makes it nearly impossible for most teachers to do all of the critical aspects of their job exceptionally well. Teachers are expected to design and execute daily lesson plans for multiple hours of the school day, orchestrate student learning activities, administer and grade student assessments, develop and implement efficient and effective classroom procedures, and differentiate their approaches for diverse student needs, all while managing the daily wild cards of student behavior.

With all of these jobs crammed onto their plates, few teachers have the time, stamina, or cognitive and emotional capacity to do each job well.

Under these circumstances, is it any surprise that so few teachers produce the results that we demand of them? Exceptional teachers are often put on pedestals in the media and in public debate, but these awesome individuals produce a level of work that is rarely sustainable and certainly not scalable.

In fact, traditional classrooms were designed to prepare students for jobs in an industrial economy of the past. To meet this end, the system was set up to process seemingly homogeneous batches of similarly aged students through one-size-fits-all instruction.

Teaching might have been a reasonably manageable job back when these assumptions held true, but in the knowledge-based economy of today, the assumptions no longer hold and teaching becomes a heroic job.

Despite the incredible challenges we face in providing good teachers at scale, there is a bright light at the end of the tunnel. The educators, innovators, and entrepreneurs that are now experimenting with blended learning are completely redesigning our models of instruction. Rather than merely layering technology on top of traditional classrooms, they are leveraging technology to transform the role of teachers, accelerate student learning, and magnify the impact of educators.

Blended learning allows much of the work of basic instruction—like drilling multiplication tables or reviewing vocabulary words—to be offloaded to computers so that teachers can focus on the aspects of teaching that they find most rewarding, such as mentoring students and facilitating exploratory learning projects.

Teachers are better than computers debate

Properly implemented blended learning does not eliminate teachers, but instead eliminates some of the job functions that teachers find most onerous. Technology will not improve our education system if we marginalize or eliminate teachers.

Likewise, our education system will not meet modern needs at scale until we innovate beyond the factory-model classroom. Innovation may lead us to classroom setups and teacher roles that look very different from today, but a human element will always be an essential part of the equation.

By framing the debate as technology vs. Instead, our conversations should focus on finding ways to let technology do what it does best so that we can leverage teachers to do what they do best.Apr 08,  · Wendy Kopp says the notion that kids can learn mainly with computers is faulty, Research shows that teachers tip the balance for kids' learning, future success.

Aug 31,  · Debate: Replacing the teacher with a computer at schools – a wise option So in the end I come to this conclusion that schools are better off computers, and replacing them with teachers would be disastrous not only for the schools but also for us the students.

Teachers vs Computers | Half of My Heart says: [ ] The Voice of. Teachers want the best for their young people and use new technologies in their lessons. But the delivery of this new technology and learning models is just as important – if not more important.

Is the teacher better than the computer? | kaja-net.com

The Guardian - Back to home. Could computers ever replace teachers? But in this complex debate there’s one thing that continues to . Debate about should computers replace teachers?: Yes or No. Sign Up | Login.

Teachers are the best

Debates | People. New Debate Heck no, computers are fail, first off all, they need eletricity to run on, when teachers rely on food, much better.. And also, computers dont have a teachers degree, they havent been to university, means they're pretty dumb.

Oct 30,  · In short, I am a much better teacher than a computer. I teach philosophy, history, and humanities, and I think I do so pretty well (with awards to back up .

Why Computers Cannot Replace Teachers